(Blacksburg, Va., Dec. 30, 2002) -- A team of Virginia
Tech researchers has experimentally verified the predictions of a mathematical
model concerning the regulation of irreversible transitions into and out of
mitosis (the division of genetic material during the cell cycle). The commitment
to mitosis must be an all-or-nothing decision; otherwise deleterious mutations
result. This research highlights the power of pairing experimental and
computational biology to understanding complex processes. Mathematical modeling
of the cell cycle and other biological events may someday lead to previously
unidentified targets for therapy of cancer and other diseases.
The article, "Hysteresis drives cell-cycle transitions in Xenopus Laevis egg
extracts," will be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences online edition the week of Dec. 30,2002 through Jan. 3, 2003 (article
#02-5349 at www.pnas.org). It is the first collaborative publication between
Virginia Tech biologists Jill Sible and John Tyson. Sible is corresponding
author.
Tyson, a university distinguished professor, has been developing mathematical
models to describe the cell cycle for many years, but only recently have
experimentalists collaborated to test the validity of these models. His
comprehensive model describing DNA synthesis and nuclear division in cell-free
extracts from frog eggs was published in 1993.
In this project, the researchers set out to test predictions made by the
mathematical model regarding specific levels of the protein cyclin required to
regulate cell division, or mitosis. The experimental challenges were
quantitative. "We had to be very precise," says Sible. "We found that,
qualitatively and quantitatively, we were able to validate three key predictions
of the model regarding the amount of cyclin required to start, maintain, and
stop mitosis."
Cells enter mitosis by activating the enzyme Cdc2 and leave mitosis when Cdc2
activity drops. Cdc2 is activated by accumulation of its partner, cyclin, and
inactivated when cyclin is destroyed.
What ensures that Cdc2 is irreversibly turned ON or OFF at mitotic entry and
exit, respectively? Does the switch function like a buzzer or a toggle?
"A buzzer is ON when one pushes hard enough on its button and stops buzzing
when one lets go. A toggle likewise switches on when one pushes hard enough on
the lever in one direction, but it will stay on when one lets go," says Tyson.
"To switch a toggle off, one must push the lever with sufficient force in the
opposite direction. Engineers call this sort of behavior hysteresis."
By manipulating the concentration of cyclin in cytoplasmic extracts prepared
from frog eggs, the Virginia Tech investigators pushed the "button" for Cdc2 to
see how the switch responded. To turn Cdc2 ON and trigger entry into mitosis
required a push of at least 40 units of cyclin. When they let up on the pressure
(by letting cyclin concentration drop to 30 or even 20 units of cyclin), the
switch stayed ON, that is, Cdc2 remained active and mitosis persisted. To turn
the switch OFF (inactivate Cdc2 and exit mitosis), required cyclin levels to
drop to 16 units or less. These experiments demonstrated that the control system
is bi-stable and hysteretic.
What regulates these irreversible switches has been a big question, Sible
explains. "Others have published mathematical models of the cell cycle that
function without hysteresis. It was not until we put our model to the test that
we could determine that hysteresis is the basis of the switches that start and
stop mitosis."
These experiments were performed in cell-free extracts derived from frog
eggs. The frog egg extract system is the most simple eukaryotic cell cycle
system but is representative of cell cycles in other organisms including humans.
"We know from many years of research, including that resulting in the 2001 Nobel
Prize in Physiology or Medicine, (awarded to Leland H. Hartwell, R. Timothy
Hunt, and Paul M. Nurse for their discoveries of key regulators of the cell
cycle), that cell cycle components are similar in frog and human cells," says
Sible.
The researchers' ultimate goal is to build a mathematical model of the human
cell cycle that would likewise reveal underlying principles of cell regulation
and be predictive. "Many predictions in the model we tested were not intuitive.
The belief is that a comprehensive mathematical model of the human cell cycle
would present a new understanding of its regulation and suggest novel ways to
control disorders such as cancer," says Sible." For example, cell cycle
'checkpoints' guard dividing cells from mistakes that may lead to cancer. Sible
continues, "We saw something relevant but subtle in our simple system. If we
raised the cyclin level modestly (beyond what was needed to trigger mitosis), we
eliminated the checkpoint that normally halts the cell cycle if there is
something wrong with the DNA."
Co-authors of the PNAS article are Wei Sha, who completed her master's degree
with Sible and is now a Ph.D. student at the Virginia Bioinformatics Institute
at Virginia Tech; Jonathan Moore of the Cancer Research United Kingdom London
Research Institute; Katherine Chen, a senior research scientist at Virginia
Tech; Antonio Lassaletta, an undergraduate student in mechanical engineering who
is studying with Sible; and Chung-Seon Yi, a postdoctoral associate with Tyson.
The research has been funded by NIH, DARPA-BIOSPICE, the Carilion Biomedical
Institute, and Virginia Tech.
Dr. Sible can be reached at 540-231-1842 or siblej@vt.edu
PR Contact: Susan Trulove,
540-231-5646, strulove@vt.edu
Learn more at
http://www.biol.vt.edu/faculty/Sible/jslabhome.htm
http://www.mpf.biol.vt.edu/